SIDE TRACKS
continued from page 22
. . .
As you’ll read in this issue, we had Scott Bergstrom, of Bergstrom Skegs, offer some insights as to what the average trail rider’s sled should be wearing for general traction. But, if you travel the internet, you’ll find additional insights from web pit stops like International Engineering’s (Woody’s) site,...
I may be wrong but the way I see what they wrote here would discourage
most snowmobilers from reading this ho-hum article. The subject was TRAIL
DESTRUCTION and how to avoid it.
You can read any traction article written since 1969 to rehash their same
old - same old!
Of course, more, larger and sharper traction products give more traction.
American Snowmobiler then goes on to write 7 3/4 inches of free print to
one of the biggest promoters of trail destroying products on the market.
Trail
Damage Causes & Solutions
Article Comparison
The reason for this comparison is much of it conflicts with the
article I wrote!
I will let the side by side format speak for itself, but I do want to add this rebuttal to their
conclusion:
It is the traction manufacturers' constant attempts to out macho each other that is destroying our trails. In the 70's into the 80's, 60 degree carbides and studs were not encouraged for use by the general public. Encouraging snowmobilers to ride as hard as they can down two-way 8 ft. wide trails is not being responsible. It does sell more wear rods, studs, tracks, skis, hoods,
bumpers, windshields...
|
American
Snowmobiler
"Tips for Saving Our Trails”
What
I said... (in red)
I don't agree... (in blue)
|
|
Scott
Bergstrom’s letter
Trail Damage / Causes and Solutions
What
they left out... ( in red)
|
|
The heartbeat of
snowmobiling is of our fragile network of trails. How we protect them
from abuse will determine how long we stay alive.
Logic and common sense
can help us minimize the damage to the trails, while still maintaining a
necessary margin of safety.
|
|
|
A number of factors
determine the amount of damage done to our snowmobile trails. These
include snow conditions on the trail, the type of sled we ride (with or
without traction products) and how we work our throttle thumb.
Trail snow conditions
can vary greatly from day to day. To minimize damage to the trails and
possibly to your- self and your sled you must adjust your riding style
and possibly your equipment.
Besides little or no
snow, powder snow is the hardest snow to maintain a trail with. Even
with 8 to 10 inches of powder there is very little flotation provided.
This means your wear rods will be running in the dirt, which especially
in the corners, will generate snirt (snow + dirt). This combination will
melt the snow much faster because the darker dirt will soak up the heat
from the sun.
Crusted snow on the
trails will provide flotation, but you can easily churn down to the
ground.
Hardpack with an ice
base is ideal, but it is not indestructible if your thumb pushes heavy
on the gas, especially on acceleration
out of corners.
Ice covered trails
creates a different situation altogether. Even the most careful of
snowmobilers is susceptible to a sudden loss of control. This condition
is the main reason traction products are recommended for safety.
|
|
A
multiple of factors determine the amount of damage done to the trails. They
include trail snow conditions, type of sled / with or with- out traction
products and how you work your thumb. Logic and common sense can help
you minimize the damage you may be doing to the trails, while still
maintaining your safety.
Trail
snow conditions can vary from day to day. To minimize damage to the
trails and possibly to yourself and your sled you must adjust your
riding style and possibly your equipment.
Besides little or no snow,
powder snow is the hardest snow to maintain a trail with. Even with 8 to
10 inches of powder there is very little floatation provided. This means
your wear rods will be running in the dirt which, especially in the
corners, will generate snirt (snow+ dirt). This combination will melt
the snow much faster because the darker dirt will soak up the heat from
the sun.
Crusted snow on the trails will provide flotation, but you can
easily churn down to the ground.
Hardpack with an ice base is ideal, but
it is not indestructible if your thumb pushes heavy on the gas,
especially on acceleration.
Ice covered trails create a different
situation altogether. Even the most careful of snowmobilers is
susceptible to a sudden loss of control. This condition is the main
reason traction products would be recommended for safety.
The
new extra travel suspensions are great for your back, but in some cases,
they are a double-edged sword. The smoother ride allows those who want
to cruise at higher speeds for longer periods of time to do so, without
becoming fatigued. The downside is apparent when you see how much more
snow becomes airborne and drifts off the trail, making it useless to
snowmobiles. The reason for this additional damage is that the track is
so much more exposed than before.
|
Different skis and ski
products serve different purposes. Longer, wider and flatter skis
provide more flotation whether steel or plastic. The drawback of steel
skis is that in a certain temperature range, snow will stick to them.
Plastic ski skins
prevent this accumulation and allow the steel ski to slide through the
snow. A disadvantage is that as resistance is lowered, due to the
slipperiness of the plastic, the sled will push straighter through the
corners. To regain turning ability you need to move up to the next level
of wear rod (ie. Hardsurfaced to a 4-inch to 6-inch carbide).
|
|
Different
skis and ski products serve different purposes. Longer, wider and
flatter skis provide more flotation whether steel or plastic. The
drawback of the steel ski is that in a certain temperature range snow
will stick to them.
Ski
skins prevent this accumulation and allow the steel ski to slide through
the snow. A disadvantage is that resistance is lowered, due to the
slipperiness of the plastic, so the sled will push straighter through
the corners. To regain your turning ability you should move up to the
next level of wear rod (ie. hardsurfaced to a 4-inch carbide or a 4 to 6
inch carbide).
Ski
Savers cover the area right next to the wear rod where skis take the
most abuse. The added edges of the Ski Savers will also help turn in
snow. Being UHMW polyethylene, like the plastic skis, they will provide
most of the slide and protection skins do. There are different
thicknesses that minimize darting by lifting the wear rods out of the
ruts. They can be used on plastic skis, steel skis, and with ski skins.
|
PLASTIC SKIS
The first plastic skis
were tri-keeled
channeled
and were introduced on the 1979-80 Chrysler
Snow Runner.
The first plastic skis for full size sleds appeared around
1990. They were as long as the longest steel skis and flexed, providing
a cushioned ride over bumpy trails. Unlike the 1979 Twin-Trac ski, which
had a wear rod on both outside edges and a deep tunnel down the middle,
it used only one wear rod and it’s shallow concave channels were on
each side of the center keel. This design trapped snow under the ski,
keeping it there, thus providing excellent flotation on even marginal
snow. The weight savings, when you include the mounting hardware, is
around 3 to 3 1/2 pounds per ski, which is important if you are racing.
Most of these ski designs focus the pressure on the wear rods.
|
|
The first plastic skis were tri-keeled and were introduced on the
1979/80 Chrysler- Snow Runner.
The
first plastic skis for full size sleds appeared around 1990. They were as long as the longest steel skis and flexed, providing
a cushioned ride over bumpy trails. Unlike the
1979 Twin-Trac ski, which had a wear rod on both outside edges and a
deep tunnel down the middle, it used only one wear rod and it’s
shallow concave channels were on each side of the center keel. This
design trapped snow under the ski, keeping it there, thus providing
excellent flotation on even marginal snow. The weight savings, when you
include the mounting hardware, is around 3 to 3 1/2 lbs. per ski, which
is important if you are racing. Most of these ski designs focus the
pressure on the wear rods.
|
Because plastic will
not withstand direct pressure it is very important that you watch your
wear rods closely. You should change them when any part of the wear rod
is worn halfway thru
or you’ll risk ski damage. There are products
available which provide additional protection for the ski at the point
where the wear rods attach. This is an especially abusive area for the
ski. An added benefit to these products is that their edges provide an
additional bite in the snow for turning. Additionally, if their leading
edges are tapered, they can help alleviate darting in the same manner as
Ski-doo’s Proactive Control System ski keel without a drag resistance
penalty.
|
|
Because plastic will not withstand
direct
pressure it is very important that you watch your wear rods closely. You
should change them when any part of the wear rod is worn halfway thru,
because ski damage will occur.
|
The new rocker bottom
plastic skis generate less friction in a straightaway, which makes them
useful in drag racing. For trail riders, rocker skis decrease the
turning effort on ice and pavement. When you apply the laws of physics
to trail riding, these benefits become counter productive to cornering.
The arch of the rocker
varies from brand to brand, so the amount of carbide making contact with
the ice or pavement varies, based on the conditions. So regardless of
how long the carbide insert is, there will be a finite amount of the
hardened material under the spindle (where the ski pressure is greatest)
biting into the ice. However, the remainder of the carbide provides
increased ruddering, if you will, in the hardpack snow. Both aspects of
the carbide’s functionality aid in turning, but on rockered skis, only
a small portion of the carbide provides bite.
|
|
The
new rockered bottom plastic skis generate less friction in a straight
away, which makes them useful in drag racing. For trail riders, it is easier
to turn the handlebars on ice and pavement. When you apply the laws of
physics to trail riding these benefits are counter productive.
The arch
of the rocker varies from brand to brand, so the amount of carbide
making contact with the ice or pavement ranges from 7/8 to 4 1/2 inches.
Even if you have 10 inches of turning carbide, only the bottom of the
arch will be working. Once that section is dull it is still the pressure
point, therefore the remaining carbide will not do much to aid in
turning. The rocker also counteracts the cushioning effect that the
flatter skis provide. There is less straddling of bumps and flotation is
diminished.
In
a nutshell, more damage will occur to the trails because of the focused
pressure on new sharp carbide and you will lose much of the resistance
needed to turn.
Wear
rods, whether standard steel or hardsurfaced, will not do damage to
pavement. The hardsurfaced rod will maintain its ability to turn in snow
longer, because it stays thicker longer.
|
TRACTION FACTS
The proper wear
pattern of the wear rod should be 60% to the front and 40% to the rear.
This will ensure maximum effectiveness of the turning carbide.
|
|
The proper wear pattern of the
wear rod should be 60% to the front and 40% to the rear. This will
ensure maximum effectiveness of the turning carbide. |
Wear rods, whether
standard steel or hard surfaced
will not penetrate ice or pavement as
much as a carbide runner will.
A hardsurfaced rod will maintain its
ability to turn in snow longer,
because it stays thicker longer than a
plain steel rod, but sacrifices the aggressive bite on ice in comparison
to a carbide - enhanced wear bar. |
|
|
Bombardier filed for
its carbide wear rod patent #3,732,939 in January of 1971.
Such carbide
wear rods
were needed when the racetracks switched from snow banked to
ice covered.
The reason carbide was
chosen was that it etches into ice for an extended length of time,
providing the resistance needed to turn the sled. They were not widely
used until the very late 1980s when the OEMs made carbides standard
equipment on some trail sleds. Even though their patent had tapered
carbide at all three locations, most other carbides had blunt ends.
These blunt ends created resistance, causing the tracks to break loose
on ice, generating a need for studs in the track. The added resistance
tells you the carbide is digging a channel into the ice.
Some
manufacturers still use blunt-ended carbides on selected models.
|
|
Bombardier filed
for their carbide wear rod patent #3,732,939 in Jan. of 1971. They were
needed when the racetracks switched from snow banked to ice covered.
The
reason carbide was chosen was that it etches into ice for an extended
length of time, providing the resistance needed to turn the sled. They
were not widely used until the very late 1980’s when the OEM’s made
carbides standard equipment on some trail sleds. Even though their
patent had tapered carbide at all three locations, most other carbides
had blunt ends. These blunt ends created resistance, causing the tracks
to break loose on ice, generating a need for studs in the tracks. The
added resistance tells you the carbide is digging a channel in the ice.
Some
still use blunt ended carbides in some models. Others are generating
more resistance by protruding their carbide point as much as .170 inch
out of the host bar. Still others are promoting 60 degree or 75 degree
points for trail riding, which also generates resistance. These carbides
are more aggressive when new, but that translates into more trail
damage. Either way, the carbide dulls faster because more of the sleds
weight is focused on the point.
If
the host bar shares more of the load, the carbide will stay sharper
longer. so even massive chunks of carbide do not add to the longevity of
your ability to turn. When your carbides are working hard going
straight, so are you. It’s called darting. Some carbides only stick
.030 inch to .050 inch or less out of the host bar. Ideally your
carbides should only be working in the corners.
Besides
carbide, the host bar diameter also affects darting. The bigger host bar
can fall deeper into the other guy’s ruts. Bigger host bars should
only be used with longer carbide for added strength, to keep it from
bending from the added side pressure.
The
traction of the track dictates the length of carbide needed up front
because studs push you straight. You therefore need enough carbide up
front to overcome that push. It is prudent to use as little carbide up
front as required. The reason being, you can generally buy 2 pair of
4-inch carbides for the price of 1 pair of 10-inch carbides. In other
words you will get twice as many miles of new carbide bite for the same
amount of money. Keep in mind that a 4 inch carbide dulls at the same
rate as a 10 inch carbide, because pavement takes an even cut the whole
length of the carbide.
Contrary
to popular belief, longer carbide does not add to the life of the host
bar on the trails. On pavement yes, because then only the carbide makes
contact. Check any used carbide wear rod and you will see that the carbide only stays in as long as the steel holds it in. Conversely, the
steel would not wear until the carbide wore down to the steel and we all
know that does not happen.
|
TRAIL DAMAGE
The type of sled you
ride can affect trail damage for several reasons. The size of the sled,
both in weight and power are two key considerations.
When greater weight is
combined with speed, there’s more momentum to be overcome in order to
turn. If your sled has a long track (over l21 inches) you would start
with a 6-inch carbide just to overcome the push of even a bare track.
Deep lug tracks have their place in deep powder, but on groomed trails
they really churn up the snow, gripping into dirt on marginal
snow-packed trails.
The new extra travel
suspensions are great for your back, but in some cases they are a
double-edged sword. The smoother ride allows those who want to cruise at
higher speeds for longer periods of time to do so, without becoming
fatigued. Because these long travel suspensions put more track area on
the ground, the downside is apparent when you see how much more snow
becomes airborne and drifts off the trail.
|
|
The
type of sled you ride can affect trail damage for several reasons. The
size of the sled, both in weight and power are two key considerations.
The more weight combined with speed, the more momentum has to be
overcome in order to turn. If your sled has a long track (over 121
inches) you would start with a 6-inch carbide just to overcome the push
of even a bare track.
Paddle tracks have their place in deep powder, but on groomed trails
they can really churn up the snow.
|
DEGREES of STUDS
The carbide stud
patent #3,838,894 was filed in December of 1972 by Donald G. Greedy, of
Special Sports Products of Caro, Michigan. The original carbide point
was 60 degree and at that time was basically for racing. The first
commercially available push- through studs were sold by the makers of
the Manta Twin Track snowmobile as far back as 1975.
Recently, trail stud
points have gone from 80 degrees to 60 degrees in an effort to provide
better traction. Racing studs have 45 degree tips and even to 30 degrees
for ice racers. These sharper points do give racers deeper and harder
penetration, but if racing products are used on the trails it means more
and more damage to paved surfaces in marginal snow conditions. Prudent
traction manufacturers do not offer or recommend racing studs or
carbides to trail riders, due to the fact that the maintenance would be
as high as requiring replacement every 200 to 300 miles. And these sharp
points would cause excessive damage to trail surfaces.
Another way to cut
down damage is to follow the stud manufacturers’ recommendations for
proper stud penetration. Most recommend between 1/4 inch and 3/8 inch
for trail riding. Recent studies have shown that sleds with less than
3/8 inch of penetration are more effective at braking than those with
greater lengths. This point can even be further evidenced by racing
rules in snocross and cross country circuits that limit competitors’
stud penetration to no more than 3/8 inch past the track lug. Again,
only carbide will etch ice and hold up against rocks and pavement
crossings for any length of time. Another traction device
available is a
hex-headed screw with carbide chips brazed to the head. They provide
plenty of scratching throughout their life and do minimal damage to the
trails.
|
|
The carbide stud patent, #3,838,894, was
filed in December of 1972 by Donald G. Greedy, of Special Sports
Products, of Caro, MI. The original carbide point was 60 degree and at
that time was basically for racing. The first commercially available
push- through studs were sold by the makers of the Manta Twin Track
snowmobile as far back as 1975.
Recently,
trail stud points have gone from 80 degree to 60 degree to 45 degree and
even to 30 degree. These sharper points do give racers deeper and harder
penetration, but transfer that to the trails and it means more and more
damage. If studs even needed a point, trail riders would be changing
them every 200 to 300 miles. The fact that they do not change them
proves the points were never needed.
Therefore, all the damage caused by new sharp studs could easily
be eliminated.
Another
way to cut down damage is to limit the stud stick out to 1/4" for
trail sleds.
It
has been established that this stick out is more effective than 3/8 inch
when it comes to stopping. Again, only carbide will etch ice for any
extended length of time. The only other carbide traction device
available is a patented ATV type screw with domed carbide chips brazed
to the head. With multiple layers of multiple points, they provide lots
of scratching throughout their life and do minimal damage to the trails.
|
SAVING TRAILS
Like everything else,
the cost of grooming trails is increasing. Volunteers harder to find and
land is changing hands at an increasing rate, making it difficult to
keep existing trails open. As the manufacturers work to improve the
environmental impact of their sleds, we need to take action to protect
our trails, both physically (i.e. stay off the trails until a good base
has been established; close the trails at night for grooming so they can
set up for four to six hours, which can increase their life ten- fold)
and financially (i.e. pool money to buy as much land as possible in
critical to snowbelt areas through State Associations).
We can enforce
these changes by requiring large registration numbers on the sleds, to
identify violators. Some areas have changed laws allowing deputized
snowmobile club members to patrol on the trails.
But still, the biggest
thing we can do to save our trails is use our own
common
sense. If the
snow is thin in the corners or at a stop sign, don’t get on the gas
and chew up the ground or pavement. It only wrecks your equipment and
damages the trail.
Purchase sensible trail riding traction products and
use them in a responsible way. Remember, when you’re out on the
hardpack trail with your friends, sharper, race-bred runners and studs
won’t give you much advantage and will deliver the same level of
safety as trail products. It comes down to you, and you alone, to do
what’s right to preserve our trails. |
|
Like
everything else the cost of grooming trails is increasing. Volunteers
are getting harder to find and land is changing hands at an increasing
rate, making it difficult to keep existing trails open. As the
manufacturers work to improve the environmental impact of their sleds,
we need to take action to protect our trails both physically (i.e. stay
off the trails until a good base has been established; close the trails
at night for grooming so they can set up for 4-6 hours, which can
increase their life ten-fold) and financially (i.e. pool money to buy as
much land as possible in critical snowbelt areas through State
Associations).
We can enforce these changes by requiring large
registration numbers on the sleds, to identify violators. Some areas
have changed laws allowing deputized snowmobile club members to patrol
on the trails.
If you apply these common sense ideas and information,
the trails and snowmobilers will be much safer.
For
more information check out- – – – Save
Our Sport – – – at www.bergstromskegs.com
|
|
|
|
|